till 2000 Mexican people seem to have a choice to elect their leader but practically they are not choice support this statement with three suitable reasons
Answers
Answered by
98
Explanation:
People in the Mexico had a choice of electing their leader in 2000 but practically they did not have the choice due to several reasons as mentioned below
- People were so poor that did not bother about the elections. There was a vast majority who did not even took part in the campaign.
- There was a lot of corruption. Apparently, people elected who they wanted to become their leader but practically someone else took advantage of corrupt voting system
- People were not well-ware or educated regarding the issue or its importance
Answered by
32
Answer:
People in the Mexico had a choice of electing their leader in 2000 but practically they did not have the choice due to several reasons as mentioned below
People were so poor that did not bother about the elections. There was a vast majority who did not even took part in the campaign.
There was a lot of corruption. Apparently, people elected who they wanted to become their leader but practically someone else took advantage of corrupt voting system
People were not well-ware or educated regarding the issue or its importance
Explanation:
mark me as brainliest
Similar questions