To what extent is it possible to characterise agriculturalproduction in the sixteenth-seventeenth centuries assubsistence agriculture? Give reasons for your answer.
Answers
Answered by
3
This question is taken from the Chapter “Peasants, Zamindars and the State Agrarian Society and Mughal Empire.”
It's far feasible to characterise agricultural manufacturing within the 16th-seventeenth centuries as subsistence agriculture. The reasons are as follows...
- Even though the primary reason of agriculture in Mughal India changed into to feed humans, so simple staples consisting of rice, wheat or millers have been the maximum frequently cultivated vegetation.
- However, the focal point on the cultivation of simple staples did no longer suggest that agriculture in medieval india became most effective for subsistence.
- We regularly encounter the term Jins-I-Kamil literally, best crops in our resources which means that that the Mughal Kingdom also recommended peasants to cultivate commercial crops along with cotton and sugarcane.
- Cotton turned into grown over a brilliant swathe huge strip territory unfold over Central India and the Deccan plateau whereas Bengal was well-known for its sugar.
- Such cash crops would additionally consist of lentils this shows how subsistence and business production had been closely intertwined in an average peasant’s conserving.
Answered by
2
Answer:
It was possible to characterise agriculture production. Main purpose of agriculture during Mughal dynasty was to feed people with basic crops like rice and wheat. During that time these crops were the most frequently grown crops. Mughal emperor also encouraged the framers to grow crops on commercial level and such crops were cotton and sugarcane. Cotton was grown on a large scale in central India and Deccan Plateau while Bengal was famous for sugarcane cultivation.
Similar questions
Science,
6 months ago
English,
6 months ago
Social Sciences,
11 months ago
Social Sciences,
11 months ago