English, asked by laharbubna34, 5 hours ago

)  Today, I, Rabindranath Tagore, completed eighty years of my life. As I look back on the vast stretch of years that lie behind me and see in clear perspective the history of my early development, I am struck by the change that has taken place both in my own attitude and in the psychology of my countrymen - a change that carries within it a cause of profound tragedy.

(2)  Our direct contact with the larger world of men was linked up with the contemporary history of the English people whom we came to know in those earlier days. It was mainly through their mighty literature that we formed our ideas with regard to those newcomers to our Indian shores. In those days, the type of learning that was served out to us was neither plentiful nor diverse, nor was the spirit of scientific inquiry very much in evidence. Thus, their scope being strictly limited, the educated of those days had recourse to English language and literature. Their days and nightly were eloquent with the stately declamation of Burke, with Macaulay’s long-rolling sentences; discussions centred upon Shakespear’s drama and Byron’s poetry, and above all upon the large-hearted liberalism of nineteenth-century English politics.

(3)  At the time, though tentative attempts were being made to gain our national independence, at heart we had not lost faith in the generosity of the English race. This belief was so firmly rooted in the sentiments of our leaders as to lead them to the hope that the victor would of his own grace pave the path of freedom for the vanquished. This belief was based upon the fact that England at the time provided a shelter to all those who had to flee from persecution in their own country. Political martyrs who had suffered for the honour of their people were accorded unreserved welcome at the hands of the English.

(4)  I was impressed by this evidence of liberal humanity of the character of the English and thus, I was led to set them on the pedestal of my highest respect. This generosity in their national character has not yet been vitiated by imperialist pride. About this time, as a boy in England, I had the opportunity of listening to the speeches of John Bright, both in and outside the parliament. The large-hearted, radical liberalism of those speeches, overflowing all narrow national bounds, had made so deep an impression on my mind that something of it lingers even today, even in these days of graceless disillusionment.





Choose the option that best captures the central idea of the passage from the given quotes. (1 Point) 1) “Jai Hind.”—Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose (2) “People are trapped in History and history is trapped in them.”—James Baldwin (3) “A nation’s culture resides in the hearts and in the soul of its people.”—Mahatma Gandhi (4) “History is who we are and why we are the way we are.”—David McCullough
5 What is the tone of the following context: “...a change that carries within it a cause of profound tragedy?” (1 Point) (a) Boredom (b) Pain and loss (c) Tired (d) Cheerful

6 Which of the following is relevant for the title of the passage? (1 Point) (a) Proud To Be Independent (b) Crisis Of Civilisation (c) Happy Indians (d) The Civilised Englishmen

7 The terms ‘large - hearted’ and ‘radical liberalism’ are used for: (1 Point)  Macaulay  John Bright  Shakespeare  Byron 8 From the third paragraph, give an antonym for ‘victorious’- (1 Point)  Victor  Vanquished Belief Persecution​

Answers

Answered by 06kalepurvesh
6

Answer:

पांडिों को िारर्ाित भेजनेमेंदयु ोधन की क्या सोच थी.

gope it help u

Answered by 06kalepurvesh
15

Answer:

पांडिों को िारर्ाित भेजनेमेंदयु ोधन की क्या सोच थी.

gope it help u

Similar questions