Math, asked by duabitkhan, 4 months ago

TRUE/FALSE
1 . ZERO IS THE SMALLEST NATURAL NUMBER.

2. 400 IS THE PREDECESSOR OF 399
3. ZERO IS THE SMALLEST WHOLE NO.
4. 600 IS A SUCCESSOR OF 599.
5. ALL WHOLE NO IS ARE NATURAL NO.
6. 1 IS THE SMALLEST WHOLE NO.

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
2

Step-by-step explanation:

1-False

2-False

3-True

4-True

5-True

6-False

hope it helps......

Answered by Anonymous
2

HELLO DUDE!!!

Answer:

1. False

Explanation: Counting numbers are called natural numbers. As 0 is not used for counting, ot is not a natural number. Examples of natural numbers are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 and so on. Hence the given statement is false.

2. False

Explanation: A number is said to be predecessor of a given number if it is 1 less than the given number. As 399-1 = 398. So 398 is predecessor of 399, not 400. Hence the given statement is false.

3. True

Explanation: All natural numbers along with 0 is said to be whole numbers. As we know, 0 is samllest among them. Hence, 0 is smallest whole number. Hence the given statement is true.

4. True

Explanation: A number is said to be successor of a given number if it is 1 more than the given number. As 499+1 = 500, So 500 is successor of 499. Hence the given statement is true.

5. False

Explanation: Whole numbers also consists of 0, but 0 is not a natural number. So, all whole numbers is not natural numbers. Hence the given statement is false.

6. False

Explanation: 0 is a whole number, but 0 is smaller than 1, so smallest whole number is 0, not 1. Hence the given statement is false.

Hope it helps,

And,

Don't forget to follow me and choose this answer as the brainliest one.

Similar questions