true or false
a judge may equate an accused if the evidence brought by the prosecution does not prove his or her guilt beyond doubt, is it true or false
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
It is sufficient if the accused person succeeds in proving a preponderance of probability in favour of his case. It is not necessary for the accused person to prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt or in default to incur a verdict of guilty.
Answered by
0
Answer:
please make my answer brainlist answer
Explanation:
false
Similar questions