Accountancy, asked by ADSINGH493, 1 year ago

Under Cholas, the ruler was the pivot on which turned the whole machinery of the state, but actual administration was not highly centralised.

Answers

Answered by autumnr35
1

Under Cholas the ruler was the pivot on which turned the whole machinery of the state, but actual administration was not highly centralised.

In this context given headlines are explained as under:

(a) The position of the Chola Monarch: The king was the pivot, around, which the whole system was based. The coronation Ceremony was marked by many festivities. The power and glory of the monarch was enchanced with the huge resources of the kingdom, vast palace establishment and splendour of the Court. The verbal orders of the King were reduced to writing, before they were communicated to the officials concerned.

(b) The functioning of the autonomous rural institutions (Gram Sabha): Gram Sabha enjoyed full powers in the management of local affairs. The village assemblies administered justice within the village except the cases involving serious crimes. They regulated water supply, gathered such as temples, schools etc. They could sell or donate land for religious purposes. Accounts were maintained with meticulous care. In case a defaulter embezzled money, he was severely dealt with.The village assembly on its affairs with the help of smaller committees, each looking after specific matters such as the tanks, gardens, temples, justice and general management.

Similar questions