Use what you know about compound statements to determine if "A piece of paper is an object that can be drawn on " would be considered a good definition. Explain.
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
hope it will help you
please mark me as a brainliest
Attachments:
Answered by
0
Answer:The statement would not be considered a good definition. The statement is a biconditional statement that can be written as the conjunction of a conditional statement and its converse. We can write it as "If an object is a piece of paper, then it can be drawn on, and if an object can be drawn on, then it is a piece of paper.” The conditional statement is true, but its converse is not. A counterexample would be that you can draw on a marker board. A good definition requires that both the conditional statement and its converse are true.
Step-by-step explanation: sample response
Similar questions