views on environment
Answers
Answer: The Wordings and the lines are pretty much complicated but I hope it helps you.
Ans:
It is very rare for an entirely new issue to emerge in public opinion polls. The environment is one such issue. Before the late 1960s there were a handful of questions about related issues such as the population explosion and sanitation. But the environment itself emerged powerfully and quickly in polls in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It soon became clear that Americans were deeply concerned about a clean and healthy environment and wanted to spend a lot of money to achieve it.
When Americans agree on policy ends, as they have on the environment, they tend to pull away from discussions of how those ends should be achieved. I, for one, am not going to go home tonight and immerse myself in the latest EPA regulations on mercury and air toxin standards. I’m probably like most people in that I hope good policy will result from the clash of interests on issues that are extremely complex. Environmental disputes are much more potent politically at the state and local levels where people haven’t agreed on ends. Think of the familiar debates over environment species protection and development
Answer:
It is very rare for an entirely new issue to emerge in public opinion polls. The environment is one such issue. Before the late 1960s there were a handful of questions about related issues such as the population explosion and sanitation. But the environment itself emerged powerfully and quickly in polls in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It soon became clear that Americans were deeply concerned about a clean and healthy environment and wanted to spend a lot of money to achieve it.
When Americans agree on policy ends, as they have on the environment, they tend to pull away from discussions of how those ends should be achieved. I, for one, am not going to go home tonight and immerse myself in the latest EPA regulations on mercury and air toxin standards. I’m probably like most people in that I hope good policy will result from the clash of interests on issues that are extremely complex. Environmental disputes are much more potent politically at the state and local levels where people haven’t agreed on ends. Think of the familiar debates over environment species protection and development.
The hundreds of poll questions that have been asked about the environment over the past forty years paint a clear picture of the evolution of Americans’ attitudes. A careful reading of them shows that both sides of the political spectrum misunderstand key elements.
Washington has made significant gains on improving environmental quality, and people’s attitudes reflect this progress. To take just one of many indicators, the proportion of Americans who worry a great deal about air pollution is down 25 points in Gallup’s data, from 63 percent in 1989 to 38 percent now. Some liberals are unwilling to acknowledge the progress for fear of undermining their cause and coffers. Some conservatives are loath to credit government because doing so undermines their commitment to limited government. But Americans see a central role for Washington in environmental projection, and conservatives need to make their case for superior solutions to the problems that remain.
The relative success of efforts to clean up the environment explains some surprising poll findings. In a 2014 Pew poll, only 32 percent of Millennials, as compared to larger shares of other age groups, said the term “environmentalist” was a perfect or near perfect description of them. In the college freshman data from UCLA, young people are much less likely than in the past to say they will be involved in an environmental cleanup. Millennials haven’t turned against the environment. They, like older Americans, simply see other issues as more pressing.
All of the younger presidential candidates today grew up in times when a strong commitment to the environment was a shared value. For this reason, it’s hard to brand them as anti-environment. This is also why the environment, which provides a consistently large advantage to the Democrats in polls, doesn’t move many voters. Liberal environmentalists’ claims that the “environment made the difference” in some congressional races are usually insubstantial. Those successes most often reflect underlying Democratic strengths in a district and not environmental concerns. Conservatives are correct that the issue isn’t a voting issue for most, but to ignore it removes them from the imperative to describe how their approaches to environmental problems are better than liberals’ approaches. Americans are sympathetic to environmental concerns, and conservatives must show that they are, too, if they want to be heard on key environmental debates.
Step-by-step explanation: