Was HP right in letting Hurd leave the company for falsification of documents
or should the company give him another chance? Explain your answer
Answers
Answered by
4
Answer:
If they had left Hurd in place amid the scandalous revelations, they would ... By falsifying expense accounts, he “committed a serious, ... “The conduct of Hurd was compounded by the HP board giving him a ... to other stakeholders, vs.
Explanation:
Answered by
0
Yes, HP did right in letting Hurd leave the company for falsification of documents.
- Providing falsifying documents in the company is a serious matter.
- It would generally constitute misconduct behaviour and result in disciplinary action.
- However, it is the act of intentionally modifying information on a document to mislead a person or in the workspace.
- Moreover, the falsification of official documents occurs due to many reasons. Employees may alter time cards to change the record of a person’s hours at work, financial documents, inventory records, sales records, etc.
- Thus, falsification is unethical and illegal. It can negatively affect the employees and the business.
- Even it costs everyone, whether it is the company itself, its employees or its customers.
#SPJ3
Similar questions