Question

We should not accept the ‘Hindu-Muslim’ periodisation of Indian history. Why? Justify

Answer 1

Answer:

The abrupt periodisation of Indian history into distinct ‘Hindu’ and ‘Muslim’ phases overlooks the historical existence of various other faiths that thrived in India during those periods. To characterise an age only through the religion of the rulers of the time is tantamount to suggest that the lives and practices of other do not have any bearing on history. Also, the rulers in India at various points in time did not share the same faith.

Answer 2

We should not have accepted the Hindu-Muslim periodisation of the Indian history.

Explanation:

• Noted and recorded with much precision about the Hindu-Muslim periodisation of our history but not the short information that contained knowledge about the other aspects of our massive history.
• Acceptance to that has caused a root way to today's discrimination on the basis of religion for a fact,it has excluded many other historical evidences of elegance and aspects within its laps.
• There were also evidences of several running facts that has already challenged this periodisation,which means that this division has focused only on the mentioned religion excluding the other ruling dynasties which is not acceptable and has shifted our knowledge to only the dominant one.
• This periodisation has limited the knowledge and mismatched the history into one singular space of segregation.

Learn more about Hindu-Muslim’ periodisation of Indian history

Why was James Mill periodisation unacceptable by the Indian historians

brainly.in/question/3907927