Question

Web diagram of fall Fall
Box. Box
Note:- Where there is box written there u have to write ans.

Answer 1

Explanation:

we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. This conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. Also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

But the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. The middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. Further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. Each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. So, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

By considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2