Question

What according to you is a more suitable form of government for India- Presidential system or parliamentary system. Give reasons for your answer. ​

Answer 1

Answer:

according to me parliamentary form of govt is better.

Explanation: because

In a parliamentary system, the head of the state may be a monarch or a president, but both of these positions are ceremonial. The head of the government, who is generally called as the Prime Minister, is the real head. Thus, all the real executive powers are vested in the Prime Minister.                    it represents diverse groups,  better coordination between legislative and executive, prevents authoritarianism, responsible govt

Answer 2

Answer:

Because the framework in England had such a large impact on the constitution-makers, the parliamentary system of government is naturally more suitable.

Explanation:

Why:

1. The original architects also envisaged that the parliamentary model would just endeavour to please the different and diverse factions that make up our nation.
2. Similarly, the official structure's strict division of powers would lead to conflicts between the two institutions of government, the chief and the legislature, which our newly independent nation could not handle.
3. There are more parliamentary governments than administrations on the planet.

In this system, the parliament takes precedence for the most part, while the leader keeps the council in mind.

Hope this helps you

Please mark me as brainliest :)