What are different opinions of the historians about Mahmud of Ghazni
Answers
Answer:
Mahmud of Ghazni (Persian: محمود غزنوی; 2 November 971 – 30 April 1030) was the first independent ruler of the Ghaznavid dynasty, ruling from 999 to 1030. At the time of his death, his kingdom had been transformed into an extensive military empire, which extended from northwestern Iran proper to the Punjab in the Indian subcontinent, Khwarazm in Transoxiana, and Makran.
Explanation:
Highly Persianized,[1] Mahmud continued the bureaucratic, political, and cultural customs of his predecessors, the Samanids, which proved to establish the groundwork for a Persianate state in northern India.[2] His capital of Ghazni evolved into a significant cultural, commercial, and intellectual center in the Islamic world, almost rivaling the important city of Baghdad. The capital appealed to many prominent figures, such as al-Biruni and Ferdowsi.[2]
He was the first ruler to hold the title Sultan ("authority"), signifying the extent of his power while at the same time preserving an ideological link to the suzerainty of the Abbasid Caliphate. During his rule, he invaded and plundered parts of the Indian subcontinent (east of the Indus River) seventeen times.[3][4]
Answer:
HISTORIANS HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS ABOUT MAHMUD OF GHAZNI. SOME HISTORIANS THINK THAT HE DID NOTHING BUT DESTROYED HINDU TEMPLES AND PLACES AND TAKE AWAY THE RICHES OF INDIA. SOME HISTORIANS SAY THAT HE WAS A BRAVE GENERAL WHO LAID THE FOUNDATIONS OF A LARGE EMPIRE.
Explanation: