History, asked by Hemantratawa77, 9 months ago

what are limitations of civil disobedience?​

Answers

Answered by zeeniasharma16
9

Answer:

The Civil Disobedience Movement succeeded in attracting the masses. However, after the break of the Round Table Conferences, it failed to regain the momentum it had created after the Dandi March.

The programme of the Civil Disobedience Movement did not succeed in attracting the participation of the Dalits.

The Indian National Congress could not assimilate the Muslim community in the Civil Disobedience Movement. After the end of the Khilafat Movement, the Muslims had strayed away from the national movement.

The Movement failed to come within any recognisable distance of the political emancipation of India. hope it's HELPS YOU follow ♥️

Answered by akki129192
3

Answer:

here is your

Explanation:

Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal of a citizen to obey certain laws, demands, orders or commands of a government or occupying international power. By some definitions[specify], civil disobedience has to be nonviolent to be called 'civil'. Hence, civil disobedience is sometimes equated with peaceful protests or nonviolent resistance.[1][2]

Henry David Thoreau popularized the term in the US with his essay Civil Disobedience, although the concept itself has been practiced longer before. It has inspired Mahatma Gandhi in his protests for Indian independence against the British Raj; and Martin Luther King Jr.'s peaceful protests during the civil rights movement in the US. Although civil disobedience is considered to be an expression of contempt for law, King regarded civil disobedience to be a display and practice of reverence for law: "Any man who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse the conscience of the community on the injustice of the law is at that moment expressing the very highest respect for law."[3

please mark as brainliest

Similar questions