what are some of the challenges you might face while decoding the information? do you think all the information found on the manuscripts is reliable? why or why not? answer in 70-80 words
If you Answer me correct means i will mark you as the brainlist
Answers
Answer:
the manuscript is only reliable when the manuscript does not have a proper structure, a coherent language, real data, or an adequate interpretation of experimental data.
Explanation:
1. Manuscripts in early days were handwritten. Writers used palm leaves as paper for writing manuscripts. The historians used to copy down those manuscripts. Different historians presented their version in their own way as many of the words or sentences were beyond their understanding. So they copied what they understood. Later it was difficult to recognize which one was the original manuscript. Historians interpreted the facts as per the manuscripts which they got. Hence we find a number of facts with different illustrations in history.
2. Manuscripts are not considered as a reliable source of history since manuscripts are written in ancient times so one should evaluate them rationally. Explanation: ... thus, manuscripts or any ancient literature pieces should be evaluated by the archeological sources of the time it was written.
3. "Why?" can sound aggressive, as well. "You like XYZ? Why?" It often comes off sounding like you're demanding a defense or explanation. By saying "Why or why not?" it give the impression that you're interested in either side of the story.