what are the advantages and the disavantages of eclecticism in teaching
Answers
Answered by
0
Advantages
Does not restrict to one perspective so allows new ideas to be formed.Therapeutic methods treat the entire disorder and not just one symptom.Humans are complex and it is not always possible to identify one precise cause.Combining methods is a useful way of validating ideas.The strengths of one method can be used to offset the weaknesses of
another.Trying to identify causation precisely risks reinforcing stereotypes.Individuals' needs are better matched to treatments when more options are available.Provides a fuller, more detailed understanding of human behaviour.Research design does not have to be dictated by the researcher's paradigmatic stance.
Disadvantages
It does not lend itself to prediction and control of behaviour.It's difficult to identify the relative contributions of each approach.Explanation of behaviour may become "watered down" when combining many perspectives.There are practical difficulties in investigating the integration of the approaches.It does not lend itself to hypothesis testing.Research methods chosen must be compatible with the paradigmatic stance of the researcher.Explanations of behaviour are not parsimonious so may lead to confusing explanations of behaviour.The researcher must have a solid grounding in combining methods to ensure that research is rigorous and robust.There are practical difficulties when providing eclectic therapy. It may be too complex for one clinician to manage.
Does not restrict to one perspective so allows new ideas to be formed.Therapeutic methods treat the entire disorder and not just one symptom.Humans are complex and it is not always possible to identify one precise cause.Combining methods is a useful way of validating ideas.The strengths of one method can be used to offset the weaknesses of
another.Trying to identify causation precisely risks reinforcing stereotypes.Individuals' needs are better matched to treatments when more options are available.Provides a fuller, more detailed understanding of human behaviour.Research design does not have to be dictated by the researcher's paradigmatic stance.
Disadvantages
It does not lend itself to prediction and control of behaviour.It's difficult to identify the relative contributions of each approach.Explanation of behaviour may become "watered down" when combining many perspectives.There are practical difficulties in investigating the integration of the approaches.It does not lend itself to hypothesis testing.Research methods chosen must be compatible with the paradigmatic stance of the researcher.Explanations of behaviour are not parsimonious so may lead to confusing explanations of behaviour.The researcher must have a solid grounding in combining methods to ensure that research is rigorous and robust.There are practical difficulties when providing eclectic therapy. It may be too complex for one clinician to manage.
Similar questions