what are the characteristics of rules
Answers
Answer:
Rules can also be divided according to a second characteristic according to whether they are working or non-working rules. Working rules are those that affect human behaviour because they are enforced. When people think about an activity or plan their strategies they take working rules into account.
Explanation:
HOPE IT HELP YOU ✌✌
Answer:
the answer is
Explanation:
What are the characteristics of law?
Scan & pay on Amazon.
Supposedly the overwhelming characteristic of USA law is that justice is blind, meaning that the law applies equally to everyone. This is true only so far as it goes. It’s the portions that are not true that fall well short of the ideal of equal justice for all. Having an attorney or the better attorney or being able to out-litigate the opposition can result in less than justice. The same goes for having personal or financial influence that skews what equal justice would require. The basic flaw in the law is that it depends upon people - those who write it, those who enforce it and those who vote (or not) for the people who do the writing and enforcing.
Constitutions. state and federal statutes, rules, regulations, building codes, etc. are all written and enforced by people. In an ideal world, individuals in the legislature pass laws (statutes) benefitting the general populace. In the real world, however, those individuals may also pass laws benefitting, for example, widget manufacturers like themselves or like their campaign contributors. The general populace may not be aware of the new statute, may not care about the statute believing it does not affect them, or may be apathetic voters or non-voters. Once the law is on the books, the judiciary must enforce it unless that law is deemed unconstitutional (US Constitution or applicable state constitution).
The judiciary, too, comprises people, who must enforce the law. Each individual inexorably carries his/her own cultural background and temperament, an intrinsic part of who that person is. Injustice can, but does not necessarily, stem from biased people in high places. In trying to be impartial and fair, one judge might logically determine that the laws for widget manufacturers do not take precedence over prior laws protecting widget workers. Another judge, with equal honesty, might determine that the new law overrides the old one. Personal views and biases may unconsciously influence legal reasoning. Even the best judges are human beings, first and foremost.
Sometimes the law itself is immoral but not illegal, leading to social malaise. Legislating morality, however, can be the proverbial road paved with good intentions, as the USA found during Prohibition. Compare the laws of the USA with that of certain foreign countries. E.g,, beheading blasphemers, stoning adulterers, raping the innocent daughter or sister of a man guilty under local law (examples not necessarily foreign legislated law - perhaps even contrary to such law - but sanctioned by custom and tradition in some places in the world).
We live in an imperfect world and can only strive, bit by bit, to make it better through the rule of law with truly blind justice. To do that, we need to educate our children in responsible citizenship, set a good example through community involvement, speak out against injustice and, most of all, to vote for the people who pass laws for the good of society rather than for their own self interests.