what are the differences between ancient and modern currency
Answers
Answered by
19
While there are plenty of similarities between modern and ancient currencies (even though they are spread across hundreds and hundreds of years and civilisations) there are a lot of differences as well.
Today we are used to working within a very rigid framework when it comes to money. We know exactly what notes and coins are in use within each country and everything is very closely monitored and evaluated on a daily basis.
While ancient currencies had their own value, they were not always in widespread use as they are today. Whereas the Euro now spreads across more than a dozen countries, in ancient times you would have had lots of currencies across that same expanse of land – sometimes more than one currency in a particular country.
But the differences do not just occur on a national or even global scale. They also occur right down to the actual coins themselves. If you were to lay a modern day coin next to an ancient one you would see plenty of differences which largely point to the leaps and bounds that minting has taken over the centuries.
While old coins tended to be circular they were far from being perfect in their design. Today we have computers and tools to show us what a perfect circle should look like, and to that end we are far in advance of our ancestors, who had to do the best job they could. While each coin would have the same design stamped on it, the quality of the design would depend on who had stamped it and how good a job they had managed to do.
Today it is all done by machine and so all the coins in your pocket which are of the same denomination will look and feel the same (provided the design is the same of course.)
One of the main differences between ancient and modern currencies is the fact that nowadays we use coins and notes for making our transactions. We no longer use the more creative means of trading which our ancestors relied on in the early days of money. It's just as well, since our modern day outfits and pockets wouldn't hold too many axe heads or knives to pay for our goods with.
There is also the fact that whatever was used as money was worth what it said it was. So a gold coin, for example, would actually have been made of gold, whereas nowadays the only type of gold involved would probably be the colour. This is why paper money took so long to catch on throughout the world. It was made of paper, which was essentially worthless when compared to all those gold coins – and yet it was supposed to be worth more to stop you having to carry around so many coins at a time, just as our modern day banknotes are. We have the Chinese to thank for the invention of the banknote, since they brought into being the note which has evolved into what we know and recognise today.
In time paper money did become more widely used, because people came to realise that it was in fact still backed by something else which was equal to its face value – unlike today, when our currencies are reinforced and exchanged more on faith than anything else.
Another big difference between ancient and modern currencies involving banknotes is the amount of control exercised over the printing of them. In times gone by, when banknotes first came into being, governments realised they could print as many of them as they liked. Unlike gold coins, which were made from a commodity which there was only a certain amount of in existence, people could make as much paper as they liked, which meant that they could in turn make as many banknotes as they liked, even if they had nothing of value to support it with.
This sounded wonderful until it was realised that people could actually start asking for gold to the value of all the notes they had – and of course when that happened everything started to collapse around the foolish and greedy governments that had printed so many in the first place. In effect they were left with a worthless pile of paper, and an economy – even back then – which was in a complete mess.
Thanks to the degree of control that was gradually attained over currencies and how they were made, this was prevented from continuing on a large scale and modern currencies don't tend to be affected from this type of problem.
Today we are used to working within a very rigid framework when it comes to money. We know exactly what notes and coins are in use within each country and everything is very closely monitored and evaluated on a daily basis.
While ancient currencies had their own value, they were not always in widespread use as they are today. Whereas the Euro now spreads across more than a dozen countries, in ancient times you would have had lots of currencies across that same expanse of land – sometimes more than one currency in a particular country.
But the differences do not just occur on a national or even global scale. They also occur right down to the actual coins themselves. If you were to lay a modern day coin next to an ancient one you would see plenty of differences which largely point to the leaps and bounds that minting has taken over the centuries.
While old coins tended to be circular they were far from being perfect in their design. Today we have computers and tools to show us what a perfect circle should look like, and to that end we are far in advance of our ancestors, who had to do the best job they could. While each coin would have the same design stamped on it, the quality of the design would depend on who had stamped it and how good a job they had managed to do.
Today it is all done by machine and so all the coins in your pocket which are of the same denomination will look and feel the same (provided the design is the same of course.)
One of the main differences between ancient and modern currencies is the fact that nowadays we use coins and notes for making our transactions. We no longer use the more creative means of trading which our ancestors relied on in the early days of money. It's just as well, since our modern day outfits and pockets wouldn't hold too many axe heads or knives to pay for our goods with.
There is also the fact that whatever was used as money was worth what it said it was. So a gold coin, for example, would actually have been made of gold, whereas nowadays the only type of gold involved would probably be the colour. This is why paper money took so long to catch on throughout the world. It was made of paper, which was essentially worthless when compared to all those gold coins – and yet it was supposed to be worth more to stop you having to carry around so many coins at a time, just as our modern day banknotes are. We have the Chinese to thank for the invention of the banknote, since they brought into being the note which has evolved into what we know and recognise today.
In time paper money did become more widely used, because people came to realise that it was in fact still backed by something else which was equal to its face value – unlike today, when our currencies are reinforced and exchanged more on faith than anything else.
Another big difference between ancient and modern currencies involving banknotes is the amount of control exercised over the printing of them. In times gone by, when banknotes first came into being, governments realised they could print as many of them as they liked. Unlike gold coins, which were made from a commodity which there was only a certain amount of in existence, people could make as much paper as they liked, which meant that they could in turn make as many banknotes as they liked, even if they had nothing of value to support it with.
This sounded wonderful until it was realised that people could actually start asking for gold to the value of all the notes they had – and of course when that happened everything started to collapse around the foolish and greedy governments that had printed so many in the first place. In effect they were left with a worthless pile of paper, and an economy – even back then – which was in a complete mess.
Thanks to the degree of control that was gradually attained over currencies and how they were made, this was prevented from continuing on a large scale and modern currencies don't tend to be affected from this type of problem.
PulkeetJain:
can you give me a another detailed answer
ok
thanks
Traditional form of money consist of gold and copper coins, grains,etc that were not authorised by any external and universal authority. Whereas, modern money are in the form of currency( notes and coins) which are authorised by an external authority( RBI) and nobody can refuse this money in a country.
Hope it helps!!
thanks
mark me Brainliest
Answered by
31
The following are the differences between the Ancient and the Modern currency:
1. In ancient times, people used grains, cattle, gold coins, copper coins, lead coins, seals etc as their currency. Whereas, in modern time, people do use currency notes, coins. Plastic money etc.
2. The ancient money was not authorized by any universal authority. Whereas, in the context of India in modern times, the currency is authorized by Reserve Bank of India (an external authority).
Similar questions