What are the function of a costitution in a democracy?
Answers
Answered by
10
All constitutional democracies use separation of powers as an important means of limiting the exercise of political power. This separation is typically among legislative, executive, and judicial functions.
Answered by
5
Heh buddy here is ur answer ......
First of all the United States of America is not a democracy but a Constitutional Republic.
So there is no role for the U.S. Constitution in a democracy since the USA is not supposed to be a democracy.
A democracy is a mobacracy where the mob rules (the majority rules).
Whereas a Republic is where the God-given rights of the individual, whether that individual is in the majority or in the minority are protected and cannot be infringed on or taken away.
What are our God-given rights? They are Life, Liberty, Property and Privacy.
So if 99% of the people say it’s ok for us, the mob, to steal the income (property) of an individual and re-distribute that stolen income to others, that is still wrong even though the mob (99%) agreed that it was ok. And since it is wrong you cannot do it and the individual should retain 100% of their property (income) no matter how many people scream otherwise.
Now if that individual wants to give some of his/her income away to others as an act of voluntary charity, that is the right to choose (Liberty) of the individual and he/she can do that of his/her own free will but he/she should not be forced to do so.
hope u like answer ...
☺☺
First of all the United States of America is not a democracy but a Constitutional Republic.
So there is no role for the U.S. Constitution in a democracy since the USA is not supposed to be a democracy.
A democracy is a mobacracy where the mob rules (the majority rules).
Whereas a Republic is where the God-given rights of the individual, whether that individual is in the majority or in the minority are protected and cannot be infringed on or taken away.
What are our God-given rights? They are Life, Liberty, Property and Privacy.
So if 99% of the people say it’s ok for us, the mob, to steal the income (property) of an individual and re-distribute that stolen income to others, that is still wrong even though the mob (99%) agreed that it was ok. And since it is wrong you cannot do it and the individual should retain 100% of their property (income) no matter how many people scream otherwise.
Now if that individual wants to give some of his/her income away to others as an act of voluntary charity, that is the right to choose (Liberty) of the individual and he/she can do that of his/her own free will but he/she should not be forced to do so.
hope u like answer ...
☺☺
Similar questions