What are the important precautions that should be taken in fish farming?
Answers
Answered by
3
important precaution that you should take in fish farminf is,
you should to check the pH value of water.of it is more acidic or basic the will not being surově.mountain the conc 7 which is neutral.
clean the water after the fed months.
did not give much ano nt of food to fish
you should to check the pH value of water.of it is more acidic or basic the will not being surově.mountain the conc 7 which is neutral.
clean the water after the fed months.
did not give much ano nt of food to fish
Answered by
0
HEY BUDDY HERE IS UR ANSWER ....!!!
》》The Precautionary Principle in international discussion《《
It has been argued, and it is widely assumed, that PP has its origin in Germanenvironmental legislation (as «Vorsorgeprinzip») from the early 1970’s onwards (Boehmer-Christiansen 1994). Yet, it is also clear that the contents of PP has undergone a development.What characterises the «Vorsorgeprinzip» in Germany is not necessarily identical to what wefind expressed in later international treaties. For instance, the weight on technologicalsolutions that seems to characterize German environmental law, is not necessarily expressedin other treaties. If we look at the International Conferences on the Protection of the North Seaand its Ministerial Declarations (Bremen 1984, London 1987, The Hague 1990, Esbjerg1995), we find a characteristic development. The first Ministerial Declaration (Bremen 1984)does not mention the PP by name at all. But in sections A6 and A7 we read:«
Recognizing
that the environment is best protected against pollution through timelypreventive measures;
Conscious
that damage to the marine environment can be irreversible or remediableonly at considerable expense and over long periods and that, therefore, coastal states andthe EEC must not wait for proof of harmful effects before taking action;...»We note here the explicit mention that taking timely and preventive action might benecessary before proof of harmful effects is established.In the London Declaration of 1987 PP has seemingly found its way in as a characterisiticproblem approach:«Accepting that, in order to protect the North Sea from possibly damaging effects of themost dangerous substances, a precautionary approach is necessary which may requireaction to control inputs of such substances even before a causal link has beenestablished by absolutely clear scientific evidence» (ibid., point VII).In the Declaration of The Hague of 1990 we find evidence that PP has become evenmore of an independent principle:«(The participants to the Declaration.) will continue to apply the precautionaryprinciple, that is to take action to avoid potentially damaging impacts of substances thatare persistent, toxic and liable to bioaccumulate even when there is no scientificevidence to prove a causal link between emissions and effects» (ibid., Preamble)
Hope u like !!
☺ BE BRAINLY ☺
》》The Precautionary Principle in international discussion《《
It has been argued, and it is widely assumed, that PP has its origin in Germanenvironmental legislation (as «Vorsorgeprinzip») from the early 1970’s onwards (Boehmer-Christiansen 1994). Yet, it is also clear that the contents of PP has undergone a development.What characterises the «Vorsorgeprinzip» in Germany is not necessarily identical to what wefind expressed in later international treaties. For instance, the weight on technologicalsolutions that seems to characterize German environmental law, is not necessarily expressedin other treaties. If we look at the International Conferences on the Protection of the North Seaand its Ministerial Declarations (Bremen 1984, London 1987, The Hague 1990, Esbjerg1995), we find a characteristic development. The first Ministerial Declaration (Bremen 1984)does not mention the PP by name at all. But in sections A6 and A7 we read:«
Recognizing
that the environment is best protected against pollution through timelypreventive measures;
Conscious
that damage to the marine environment can be irreversible or remediableonly at considerable expense and over long periods and that, therefore, coastal states andthe EEC must not wait for proof of harmful effects before taking action;...»We note here the explicit mention that taking timely and preventive action might benecessary before proof of harmful effects is established.In the London Declaration of 1987 PP has seemingly found its way in as a characterisiticproblem approach:«Accepting that, in order to protect the North Sea from possibly damaging effects of themost dangerous substances, a precautionary approach is necessary which may requireaction to control inputs of such substances even before a causal link has beenestablished by absolutely clear scientific evidence» (ibid., point VII).In the Declaration of The Hague of 1990 we find evidence that PP has become evenmore of an independent principle:«(The participants to the Declaration.) will continue to apply the precautionaryprinciple, that is to take action to avoid potentially damaging impacts of substances thatare persistent, toxic and liable to bioaccumulate even when there is no scientificevidence to prove a causal link between emissions and effects» (ibid., Preamble)
Hope u like !!
☺ BE BRAINLY ☺
Similar questions