Question

What are the matters considered in order to establish federal structure in nepal

Answer 1

Explanation:

Where there already is a single nation (like France or Norway for two examples) there is no need for a federal system. It is only in nation-states that have a long history of local independent states (like the German principalities that had been largely independent from medieval times until the mid 19th century) or the United States if you count the 150+ years of our colonial era) that you find the need for such a system.

to phrase it more universally, federal government structures are needed when there are many competing local sovereign powers and you need to get them all working together in a system that is more unified than a confederacy but those local sovereigns are not willing to give up enough power to be forged into a single nation. Such a system may be necessary in cases of intense tribal animosities (like Iraq and Afghanistan) or where centralized power is an alien overlay (like India where the central government was imposed by the British) but absent factors like that I can not image why someone would want a federal system.

Answer 2

Explanation:

Don’t bother with a federal system. Federations are more expensive from duplication of most agencies of government. And federations are much more complex and they just get even more complex with time. As complexity grows then the government becomes more prone to failures and problems of human error - nobody is smart enough to understand all the ramifications of even a simple policy initiative. Another troublesome feature of federalism is the diffusion of responsibility that can be supportive of corruption.

There’s a better alternative to federalism and that would be the adoption of a policy called subsidiarity. That is a principle that government power ought to reside at the lowest feasible level (i.e. at the local or regional level, instead of the national or supranational level, unless the latter presents clear advantages). Such a policy is not only wise and respectful of regional differences but is also flexible, adoptable, and good for evolution according to the flow of history.