Question

what are the three outcomes of politics of social defence

Answer 1

I think you meant division instead of defence.. So here it is...

Three factors which determine the outcomes of politics of social divisions:
→ The people's perception of their identities: When this is singular, the accommodation of other identities becomes difficult.
→ Representation of a community by political leaders: While representing a community, if politicians raise demands that are constitutional, then it is easier to accommodate those demands.
→ The government's reaction: If the reasonable demands of a community are suppressed by the government, then it leads to social divisions, which in turn threaten the integrity of the country.

Answer 2

$\boxed{HERE \: IS \: YOUR \: ANSWER}$

Three factors are crucial in deciding the outcome of $\color{red}{politics\: of \:social\: division:}$

$\boxed{How \:people\: perceive \:their\: indentities}$
If people see their identities in singular and exclusive term,it becomes very difficult to accommodate. It is much easier $<b>if the people see that their identities are multiple and are complementary with the national identity.$ This help them to stay together.

$\boxed{How \:political\: leaders\: raise\: the \:demands \:of \:any \:community }$
It is easier to accept the demands that are within the constitutional framework and are not at the cost of another community. $<b>The leaders of different communities presented their demands in a such a way that these could not be accommodated within a single community$ .

$\boxed{How\: the\: government\: reacts \:to\: the\: demand\: of \:different\: groups}$
$<b>If the rulers are willing to share power and accommodate the reasonable demand of minority community, social division become less threatening for the country$ .But if they try to suppress such a demand in the name of national unity, the end result is often quite opposite.

❤HOPE IT HELPS YOU❤
ッ