What are the two principles that define the rule of law
Answers
Use of the phrase can be traced back to 16th-century Britain, and in the following century the Scottish theologian Samuel Rutherford employed it in arguing against the divine right of kings.[3] John Locke wrote that freedom in society means being subject only to laws made by a legislature that apply to everyone, with a person being otherwise free from both governmental and private restrictions upon liberty. "The rule of law" was further popularized in the 19th century by British jurist A. V. Dicey. However, the principle, if not the phrase itself, was recognized by ancient thinkers; for example, Aristotle wrote: "It is more proper that law should govern than any one of the citizens".[4]
The rule of law implies that every person is subject to the law, including people who are lawmakers, law enforcement officials, and judges.[5] In this sense, it stands in contrast to a monarchy or oligarchy where the rulers are held above the law.[citation needed] Lack of the rule of law can be found in both democracies and monarchies, for example, because of neglect or ignorance of the law, and the rule of law is more apt to decay if a government has insufficient corrective mechanisms for restoring it.
The rule of law is Defined by the four principles which constitute the definition of this rule of law and it was made under the international rules and regulations or norms that are still followed.
● Open Government - the process which involves, administers and Infosys the laws of a country must be accessible, fair and efficient in order to be called as a rule of law.
● Accountability - from the government to a very common person everyone is accountable in a society and has equal role to play.
● Just laws - the laws are clear, publicised, stable and just and must be applied evenly and should be formed like that that they protect the fundamental rights of an individual.
● Accessible, Impartial dispute resolution - justice must be delivered MD by the competent and ethical and independent representatives I am the neutral who are accessible and have educate amount of resources. Show the justice that is to be delivered must be impartial and should provide a resolution for any dispute which doesn't stand for a single person but accounts in the favour of both.