What are two ways the Bill of Rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings? It established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role. It stated that the English monarchy was a position that Parliament delegated. It stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by Parliament. It established that the people of England had the right to choose the monarch. It abolished the role of the monarch as the head of the Church of England.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The two ways that opposes that the Bill of rights opposes the idea of divine right of kings are: - it established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role - and it stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by Parliament. These ideas are the reason why there is a great difference between the Bill of rights and the rights of kings.
It established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role. It stated that the English monarchy was a position that Parliament delegated. It stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by Parliament. It established that the people of England had the right to choose the monarch. It abolished the role of the monarch as the head of the Church of England.
your answer is absolutely perfect
Answer:
The Bill of Rights contradicts the concept of monarchs having a divine right in two ways: it established that religion had no bearing on the monarch's position, and it indicated that the monarch's authority was subject to constraints imposed by Parliament. The discrepancy between the Bill of Rights and the rights of monarchs is due to these principles.
It established that the monarch's function was unaffected by religion. It asserted that the English monarchy was a delegated status by Parliament. The monarch's power was limited by Parliament, according to the document. It established the right of the English people to choose their ruler. The monarch's function as the head of the Church of England was eliminated.
What is the notion that monarchs are endowed with divine power?
The theory of the divine right of kings was a political philosophy in European history that maintained that kings received their power from God and hence could not be held responsible for their conduct by any earthly authority, such as a parliament.