Question

What arguments would you make before a court presiding over a tort law action arising from breach of a statutory provision by a pertinent duty bearer defendant to persuade the court to find that the relevant Plaintiff could still have a cause of action in tort although the concerned statute does not make provision for such causes of action arising from a breach of any of the legal obligations it creates.

Answer 1

Answer:

The typical elements are that the defendant owed a duty of care to the victim, the defendant breached that duty of care, the breach caused the plaintiff to sustain injury and the victim incurred damages as a result. The breach of the duty of care is predicated on what the duty of care is.

What are the three main types of torts?

Torts fall into three general categories: intentional torts (e.g., intentionally hitting a person); negligent torts (e.g., causing an accident by failing to obey traffic rules); and strict liability torts (e.g., liability for making and selling defective products - see Products Liability).

Answer 2

Explanation:

Just give Me some minutes

I will definitely tell your question answer

For that you have to follow Me ....