Question

what could possibly happen if their efforts to achieve democracy would generate physical violence in the process?


i need answer asap.​

Answer 1

Answer:

responses to rising violence can strengthen state and non-state security actors ... support even when they end up in conflict with the state . ... which can generate anti-government violence.

Answer 2

Physical violence to achieve democracy can lead to the end of democracy.

Explanation:

1. In a true sense, nonviolence aspires to alleviate the spiritual and moral void that I previously identified as contemporary man's main problem. It aims to achieve moral purposes by using moral means.
2. Nonviolence is an effective and moral weapon. It is, without a doubt, a weapon unlike any other in history, since it cuts without injuring and elevates the man who wields it.
3. This idea appeals to me because I feel it is the only way to rebuild a shattered community. It is a means for enforcing the right rule by appealing to the conscience of the large decent majority who have let their consciences slumber due to blindness, fear, pride, and foolishness.