Social Sciences, asked by devchhaya, 1 year ago

What did ambedkar mean to say in following lines."On 26 Jan,1950 we are going to enter a life of contradiction.

Answers

Answered by sheelu82
39
His warning  was that India should not just remain content with political democracy, but strive for social democracy as well. Ambedkar said if we as a society continue to deny equality in our social and economic life, then this could one day become a threat to our political democracy. Since independence all governments have claimed to pursue the cause of social and economic equality; however, the progress made so far is hardly adequate. And though this might not seem as a major threat right now, if this issue is consistently ignored, it has the potential to jeopardize our political democracy.
“On the 26th of January 1950, we are going to enter into a life of contradictions. In politics we will have equality and in social and economic life we will have inequality. In politics we will be recognizing the principle of one man one vote and one vote one value. In our social and economic life, we shall, by reason of our social and economic structure, continue to deny the principle of one man one value. How long shall we continue to live this life of contradictions? How long shall we continue to deny equality in our social and economic life? If we continue to deny it for long, we will do so only by putting our political democracy in peril. We must remove this contradiction at the earliest possible moment or else those who suffer from inequality will blow up the structure of political democracy which is Assembly has to laboriously built up.”
Answered by nafibarli789
1

Answer:

"On 26 Jan 1950, we are going to enter a life of contradiction."

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar expressed his anxiety over the unequal position of the Dalits

Explanation:

(i) Dr. B.R. Ambedkar expressed his anxiety over the unequal position of the Dalits. He stated that in politics the Dalits would enjoy equivalency but in social and economic life they would hold imbalance.

(ii) In politics they would be recognizing the principles of one man one vote and one vote one value. But in their social and economic dynamism, they would continue to refuse the principle of one man one value.

(iii) In this way, they would resume living a life of contradictions. Intrinsically, they required equivalency in social as well as economic life.

#SPJ3

Similar questions