what did people demand through the slogan No taxation without representation by James ottis?
Answers
Answered by
4
Answer:
a phrase, generally attributed to James Otis about 1761, that reflected the resentment of American colonists at being taxed by a British Parliament to which they elected no representatives and became an anti-British slogan before the American Revolution; in full, “Taxation without representation is tyranny.”
Answered by
1
Answer:
MARK ME BRAINLIEST
- Explanation:
- Generally attributed to James Otis about 1761, that reflected the resentment of American colonists at being taxed by a British Parliament to which they elected no representatives and became an anti-British slogan before the American Revolution; in full, “Taxation without representation is tyranny.”
- In English history, "no taxation without representation" was an old principle and meant that Parliament had to pass all taxes.
- The British government demanded that the colonists pay higher and higher taxes. ... They wanted the right to vote about their own taxes, like the people living in Britain. But no colonists were permitted to serve in the British Parliament. So they protested that they were being taxed without being represented.
- His well-known catchphrase "Taxation without Representation is tyranny" became the basic Patriot position.
- Why did the colonists have no representation in Parliament?
=====Because the colonists were represented only in their provincial assemblies, they said, only those legislatures could levy taxes in the colonies. This concept was famously expressed as "No taxation without representation".
- Under the British Constitution, no British subjects could be taxed without the consent of their representatives in Parliament. ... They were, however, clearly being taxed. The colonists considered the constant imposition of taxes without a vote to be unconstitutional. It was, they felt, "taxation without representation."
Similar questions