what did the narrator relise at the end
Answers
Explanation:
It used to be that narration was viewed as a crutch. When you heard they were adding narration to a movie, it was usually bad news. Maybe it was because in previews the audience got lost and couldn’t follow the story, so they had to add narration. “Blade Runner” seems to fall into this category. Even though today it’s considered a classic, at the time of release it was in trouble, confusing to audiences, and Decker’s (Harrison Ford) narration was added to make it more clear.
This shows you that a lot of people feel that a well told story should not require narration, unless narration is specifically a part of the storytelling style, such as somebody recounting a past event in a kind of literary style. You should try to find ways to communicate everything visually, and even use dialogue sparingly. This is what is considered the most “filmic,” as in pure cinema. The highest state of the art.
There are some famous cases of narration being a central part of a film, even if not necessarily in a good way. For example in “Sunset Boulevard” the well written and well delivered narration by one of the characters in the film, William Holden, seems artistically well integrated into the piece. Only when Holden dies at the end do we realize the movie has been narrated by a dead man. Probably a plot hole.
Think of narration a bit like title cards in a silent movie. The fewer needed the better the job the director has done.