what do the difference in the judgment given in the high court and supreme court in sudha goel's case
Answers
Answer:Lower Court: The Lower Court convicted Laxman his mother Shakuntia and his brother-in-law Subash Chandra and sentenced all three of them to death. High Court: The High Court, after hearing the arguments of all the lawyers, decided that Sudha had died due to an accidental fire caused by the kerosene stove. Laxman, Shakuntia and Subash Chandra were thus acquitted by the High Court. Supreme Court: The Supreme Court heard the arguments of the lawyers and reached a decision that was different from that of the High Court. They found Laxman and his mother guilty but acquitted the brother- in-law Subash because they did not have enough evidence against him, The Supreme Court awarded the accused life time.
Please mark it as brainliest
High Court and the Supreme Court had different opinion regarding Sudha Goel's case.
Explanation:
- According to High Court ,after hearing all the arguments of all the lawyer High Court's opinion was Sudha Goel died due to an accident that is due to fire.
- On the other hand Supreme Court had totally a different opinion after hearing all the arguments from the lawyers.
- Shakuntala , Lakshman as well as Shubhas Chandra were accused.
- Once the Supreme Court give its verdict one cannot appeal to a lower court.
To know more:
Short note on Supreme Court?
https://brainly.in/question/7174314
Short note on High Court?
https://brainly.in/question/8515328