Question

what do you know about judicial war​

Answer 1

Explanation:

Although there is much that divides the speakers here today,

there is one point upon which there is general agreement-the

judicial nominations process has become increasingly divisive and

is exacting a considerable toll on both the candidates and on the

process itself. Indeed, it may very well be, as Judge Jones sug-

gests, that the delays, partisanship, and acrimony currently

dominating the process are deterring some able and talented law-

yers from seeking positions in the federal judiciary.'

In part, I suspect that the current judicial nominations battles

are simply symptomatic of the broader political and cultural wars

that so deeply divide this country. The nation is split literally

down the middle between conservatives and liberals, Democrats

and Republicans, red states and blue states, and there is little

reason to expect that in this current climate the judicial nomina-

tions process should be the issue that flies below the partisan ra-

dar. Indeed, given the stakes involved, the fact that the judicial

nominations process has generated as much vitriol as it has is

anything but surprising. After all, the matters that routinely

come before the federal courts are the very issues that deeply di-

vide us. In the last few years alone, the Supreme Court has is-

sued critical rulings on such hot-button issues as gay rights,2

school vouchers,3 the environment,4 affirmative action,5 the

Pledge of Allegiance, 6 the war on terror,7 and abortion'-just to

Answer 2

Answer:

The judiciary is the branch of government that interprets the law. Such systems may have three branches: Legislature, Executive and Judiciary. Often the judiciary branch has courts of first resort, appellate courts, and a supreme court or constitutional court.