What do you think about corruption
Answers
Answered by
1
hey dear friend!!!!
the process by which a word or expression is changed from its original state to one regarded as erroneous or debased.
i hope it may help u !!!
the process by which a word or expression is changed from its original state to one regarded as erroneous or debased.
i hope it may help u !!!
Answered by
2
In British society corruption wears a benign innocent face and can do so because there is no transparency so it is hidden and there is a comfortable sense generated of corruption not existing.
We have, indeed, a Director General of Propriety and Ethics, Ms Sue Gray, in the Cabinet Office of the UK Civil Service. You would think her role is to shine light in dark corners but in fact it is to spread the darkness. She secretly condoned a cabinet minister, Michael Gove, using his wife’s private email account for government business, presumably to avoid Freedom of Information scrutiny. (Shades of Hillary?) when this was exposed, Ms Gray was forced to reverse her position but remained in post and has suffered no penalty. When confronted with a case of a Permanent Secretary, Philip Rutnam, Department for Transport, authorising and endorsing falsehoods to the public and the Cabinet Office to cover up a highly questionable commercial scam, Ms Gray not only refused to take any action, let alone condemn it, completely avoided denying it as she couldn't, and she refused even to consider the issue - and the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood then claimed there was no professional misconduct and that everything had been thoroughly investigated. (In fact this was so ludicrous and Mr Rutnam’s position so destabilising, Sir Jeremy took action to remove Mr Rutnam from the line of fire in the best traditions of the senior Civil Service and promoted him to the Home Office.)
And people claim that the UK Civil Service is free of corruption!
We have, indeed, a Director General of Propriety and Ethics, Ms Sue Gray, in the Cabinet Office of the UK Civil Service. You would think her role is to shine light in dark corners but in fact it is to spread the darkness. She secretly condoned a cabinet minister, Michael Gove, using his wife’s private email account for government business, presumably to avoid Freedom of Information scrutiny. (Shades of Hillary?) when this was exposed, Ms Gray was forced to reverse her position but remained in post and has suffered no penalty. When confronted with a case of a Permanent Secretary, Philip Rutnam, Department for Transport, authorising and endorsing falsehoods to the public and the Cabinet Office to cover up a highly questionable commercial scam, Ms Gray not only refused to take any action, let alone condemn it, completely avoided denying it as she couldn't, and she refused even to consider the issue - and the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood then claimed there was no professional misconduct and that everything had been thoroughly investigated. (In fact this was so ludicrous and Mr Rutnam’s position so destabilising, Sir Jeremy took action to remove Mr Rutnam from the line of fire in the best traditions of the senior Civil Service and promoted him to the Home Office.)
And people claim that the UK Civil Service is free of corruption!
Similar questions