Question

What does the writer mean when
She say's
Saheb is no
longer
his own master !​

Answer 1

Answer:

Sahib is not her headmaster anymore

Explanation:

PLZ FOLLOW ME AND MARK THIS AS BRAINLIST

Answer 2

Answer:

• When the writer says, that Saheb is not his own master anymore, she is contrasting the two occupations of Saheb, about how it was a disadvantage to his freedom even though it was advantageous monetarily.
• Saheb was a ragpicker, during this time he was his own master because he could choose his own timings for the day and rest whenever he feels tired. He could swing on the swings and watch rich children play tennis whenever he wished.
• Yet, as a ragpicker, Saheb was not financially stable and his monetary stability was uncertain.
• Saheb then worked in a tea stall. During this time, he was paid a fixed wage of Rs. 800 per month and was given three meals a day. Yet, the steel canister belonged to someone else and he had to bear the weight of it.
• He could not watch tennis matches or rest whenever he needed. Thus his freedom of being his own master was curtailed.