What factors could have made the politics of Nepal full of turmoil between 2007 and 2017 BS? Explains in short.
Answers
Explanation:
The politics of Nepal functions within the framework of a parliamentary republic with a multi-party system.[1] Executive power is exercised by the Prime Minister and his/her cabinet, while legislative power is vested in the Parliament.
It has three political parties mainly recognised in the federal parliament: Nepal Communist Party (NCP), Nepali Congress (NC),[1] and Janata Samajwadi Party (JSPN).[1] While all major parties officially espouse democratic socialism, NCP is considered leftist while Nepali Congress is considered centrist, with most considering it center-left and some center-right.[2] The party JSPN is center-left to left-wing.[3] During most of the brief periods of democratic exercise in the 1950s as well as the 1990s, Nepali Congress held a majority in parliament.[4] Following the entry of the Maoists into the political process, they were the largest party in the first constituent assembly and Nepali Congress was the largest in the second, with no party winning a majority.[5] In second constituent assembly Nepali Congress stood first without winning a majority. In the aftermath of the 2017 elections, the first one according to the new constitution, NCP has become the ruling party at the federal level as well as six out of seven provinces.[6] While Nepali Congress has a significantly reduced representation, it is the only major opposition to the ruling communist party in all levels of government.[7]
The Economist Intelligence Unit rated Nepal a "hybrid regime" in 2019,[8]while the polity data series considers it to be a democracy.[9][needs update]