Question

What if india had not been independent and still under British rule (explain in a paragraph if possible)

Answer 1

Answer:

I WILL TRY TO SAY IT IN A PARAGRAPH

Explanation:

IF INDIA HAD NOT GOT INDEPENDENCE FROM THE BRITISH RULE THERE WERE SOME GOOD AND BAD . THE GOOD WHAT IT WOULD BE WAS THAT OUR COUNTRY WOULD HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED AS OTHER COUNTRIES LIKE USA,UK,LONDON AND PARIS AND ALL OTHER DEVELOPED COUNTRIES. OUR COUNTRY WOULD HAVE MANY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES AND THEY WOULD HAVE THEIR OWN TYPE OF GOVERNMENT AND EVEN VERYONE WOULD HAVE GOT EDUCATION AND THERE WAS NO POVERTY . THE BAD WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN IS THAT OUR INDIA IS RICH IN CULTURE,DIVERSITY AND OUR AGRICULTURE AND EVEN INDIA IS LARGEST DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY IN THE WORLD AND BECAUSE WE STAY UNDER BRITISH RULE WE WOULD HAVE LOST OUR FLAG, CULTURE,DIVERSITY,AGRICULTURE AND EVEN THOUGH OUR DEMOCRACY AND LANGUAGES. THEN WE WOULD COME TO A DISEASE BECAUSE OF LOT OF PROCESSED FOOD AND MOST IMPORTANTLY FAMILY WOULD HAVE BEEN SEPERATED FOM US AS KIDS NEVER CARE ABOUT THEIR PARENTS IN OTHER COUNTRIES AS IN INDIA WE CARE A LOT. IF WE WE WOULD HAVE BEEN UNDER BRITISH RULE WE WOULD LOST EVERYTHING OF OUR OWN.

THANK YOU I HOPE THAT IT WILL HELP YOU!!

HAVE A GREAT DAY AHEAD :)