Accountancy, asked by KayDee6, 1 year ago

what is Garner vs Murray case?

Answers

Answered by anshaarav786
4

When a partner’s capital account shows a debit balance on dissolution of the firm, he has to pay the debit balance to the firm to settle his account. If the partner becomes insolvent, he is unable to pay back the amount owed by him to the firm in full. The amount not paid is a loss to the firm which under the Garner vs Murray Rule is to be borne by the solvent partners.
According to Garner vs Murray Rule:

The loss on account of insolvency of a partner is a CAPITAL loss which should be borne by the solvent partners in the ratio of their capitals standing in the balance sheet on the date of dissolution of the firm.

Notes:

“Capital” in this case relates to the real capital of the partners and not capital as may be standing in the books of partnership firm in the names of different partners. This distinction is especially critical when the partners are maintaining their capital accounts on fluctuation capital system. The true capitals according to this rule will be ascertained after making all adjustments regarding reserves, drawings, unrecorded assets on the date of the balance sheet on the date of dissolution of the partnership firm. When the capitals are FIXED, no such adjustment is required.

Where a partner is solvent but has a debit balance in his/her capital account, just before the dissolution of the partnership firm, such a partner will not be required to bear the loss on account of insolvency of a partner.

The rules dictates that:-

The solvent partners should bring in cash equivalent to their respective share of loss on realization and

The loss due to the insolvency of a partner should be then be divided among the solvent partners in the ratio of capitals standing after the partners have brought in cash equal to their share of loss on realization

Hope it help.

Mark it brainliest
Answered by kumarmonu89761
1

Answer:

The required answer is shown below:

Explanation:

When the firm dissolves and a partner's capital account shows a debit amount, he must pay the firm the debit sum to settle his account. In the event of insolvency, the partner is unable to fully repay the sum owed to the company. According to the Garner v. Murray Rule, the solvent partners are responsible for covering the firm's loss associated with the unpaid sum.

The Garner v. Murray Rule states:

The solvent partners shall bear the loss resulting from the insolvency of a partner in proportion to the capital they had on hand at the time of the firm's dissolution.

Notes:

In this example, "capital" refers to the actual capital of the partners, not capital that may be recorded in the partnership firm's books under several partners' names. When the partners are managing their capital accounts on a fluctuating capital system, this distinction becomes even more important. After making all necessary adjustments for reserves, drawings, and unrecorded assets as of the date of the balance sheet on the date of the partnership firm's dissolution, the true capitals in accordance with this rule will be determined. There is no need for this change when the capitals are FIXED.

A partner who is solvent but has a debit balance in their capital account immediately before the partnership firm dissolves will not be compelled to incur the loss as a result of another partner's insolvency.

The law requires that:

Each partner's share of the loss on realization should be paid in cash by the solvent partners, and

After the partners have brought in cash equal to their share of the loss on realization, the loss owing to the insolvency of a partner should subsequently be split among the solvent partners in the ratio of capital standing.

SPJ2

Similar questions