what is goritic daift
Answers
Genetic drift is the change in the frequency of an existing gene variant in a population due to random sampling of organisms. The alleles in the offspring are a sample of those in the parents, and chance has a role in determining whether a given individual survives and reproduces.
Answer:
variation in the relative frequency of different genotypes in a small population, owing to the chance disappearance of particular genes as individuals die or do not reproduce
Explanation:
Not to be confused with Genetic draft, Antigenic drift, or Antigenic shift.
Part of a series on
Evolutionary biology
Darwin's finches by Gould.jpg
Darwin's finches by John Gould
Key topics[show]
Processes and outcomes[show]
Natural history[show]
History of evolutionary theory[show]
Fields and applications[show]
Social implications[show]
Tree of life.svg Evolutionary biology portalCategory CategoryRelated topics
vte
Genetic drift (also known as allelic drift or the Sewall Wright effect)[1] is the change in the frequency of an existing gene variant (allele) in a population due to random sampling of organisms.[2] The alleles in the offspring are a sample of those in the parents, and chance has a role in determining whether a given individual survives and reproduces. A population's allele frequency is the fraction of the copies of one gene that share a particular form.[3]
Genetic drift may cause gene variants to disappear completely and thereby reduce genetic variation.[4] It can also cause initially rare alleles to become much more frequent and even fixed.
When there are few copies of an allele, the effect of genetic drift is larger, and when there are many copies the effect is smaller. In the middle of the 20th century, vigorous debates occurred over the relative importance of natural selection versus neutral processes, including genetic drift. Ronald Fisher, who explained natural selection using Mendelian genetics,[5] held the view that genetic drift plays at the most a minor role in evolution, and this remained the dominant view for several decades. In 1968, population geneticist Motoo Kimura rekindled the debate with his neutral theory of molecular evolution, which claims that most instances where a genetic change spreads across a population (although not necessarily changes in phenotypes) are caused by genetic drift acting on neutral mutations.[6][7]
Contents
1 Analogy with marbles in a jar
2 Probability and allele frequency
3 Mathematical models
3.1 Wright–Fisher model
3.2 Moran model
3.3 Other models of drift
3.4 Random effects other than sampling error
4 Drift and fixation
4.1 Rate of allele frequency change due to drift
4.2 Time to fixation or loss
4.3 Time to loss with both drift and mutation
5 Versus natural selection
6 Population bottleneck
6.1 Founder effect
7 History
8 See also
9 Notes and references
10 Bibliography
11 External links
Analogy with marbles in a jar
The process of genetic drift can be illustrated using 20 marbles in a jar to represent 20 organisms in a population.[8] Consider this jar of marbles as the starting population. Half of the marbles in the jar are red and half are blue, with each colour corresponding to a different allele of one gene in the population. In each new generation the organisms reproduce at random. To represent this reproduction, randomly select a marble from the original jar and deposit a new marble with the same colour into a new jar. This is the "offspring" of the original marble, meaning that the original marble remains in its jar. Repeat this process until there are 20 new marbles in the second jar. The second jar will now contain 20 "offspring", or marbles of various colours. Unless the second jar contains exactly 10 red marbles and 10 blue marbles, a random shift has occurred in the allele frequencies.
If this process is repeated a number of times, the numbers of red and blue marbles picked each generation will fluctuate. Sometimes a jar will have more red marbles than its "parent" jar and sometimes more blue. This fluctuation is analogous to genetic drift – a change in the population's allele frequency resulting from a random variation in the distribution of alleles from one generation to the next.
It is even possible that in any one generation no marbles of a particular colour are chosen, meaning they have no offspring. In this example, if no red marbles are selected, the jar representing the new generation contains only blue offspring. If this happens, the red allele has been lost permanently in the population, while the remaining blue allele has become fixed: all future generations are entirely blue. In small populations, fixation can occur in just a few generations.