Question

What is hereditary form of kingship? Mention the advantages and disadvantages of hereditary form of kingship.

Answer 1

Answer:

heredity

Explanation:

List of the Disadvantages of a Monarchy

1. Monarchies can require minors to serve as their country’s head of state.

Because a monarchy often uses family lineage as the designation of who can take over the throne, there are numerous instances in history when children were placed in this role. This disadvantage has even occurred in the modern era. The final emperor of China before the communist takeover was only two years old when brought into that position. Tahiti installed King Pomare III in this position at just 17 months.

There are even younger examples, such as King Sobhuza II of Swaziland who became a ruler at just four months of age. He would go on to rule for 82 years. Even England was not immune to this problem, with King Henry VI crowned when he was only eight months old.

2. It can be difficult to stop the powers of the monarchy.

The head of state has absolute control over the government. Even when this approach is more ceremonial than functional, an elected legislature must still work with the sovereign to ensure that laws and regulations fit within an expectation guideline. That means the person in charge can decree almost anything to have it become law if their authority is considered absolute.

If the sovereign decides to become violent or oppressive, then the nation has little choice but to go along with the problem or try to overthrow the government. Monarchs can even declare war on other countries unilaterally because there are so few checks and balances available in this system.

3. There is no guarantee of competency coming from the leadership.

New rulers in a monarchy come from the line of succession. This process is usually based on family lineage, but some leaders will designate a specific person if they don’t leave any heirs. That means some people can receive leadership training at an early age so that they are ready to ascend to the throne, but that advantage is not always possible. You can train some people to be political leaders and have them fail at the position. Others might not even want to be in charge in the first place.

When there is apathy within the monarchy, then the nation will suffer. This one leader plays an integral role in the entire governing process since they are part of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. This disadvantage is so powerful that it has caused entire governments to fall in the past.

4. A monarchy can decide to remove all checks and balances.

Even if a monarchy decides to take a constitutional approach, these individual leaders can decide to move in a different direction because of this government’s structure. King Sobhuza II helped to write a governing document for his nation only to throw it out about five years later. This disadvantage applies even when the head of state is in more of a symbolic role. They can even influence societal balances, such as freedom of the press, to continuously reinforce their powers over the population.

5. Monarchies create a class-based society.

Almost any government structure results in the formation of a class-based society. Only true socialism where the public owns everything avoids this disadvantage. The one threat that you’ll see in this area from a monarchy is that wealth becomes a foundation of family status. If you are born into money, then society says that you’re superior to those who don’t have as much as you do. There are even titles that some people have, such as Lord, Duke, or Baron, that reflect the “importance” of wealth.

6. The structures of a monarchy are variable throughout the world.

Because about one-quarter of the monarchies in the world fall under the leadership of the Commonwealth realm, there is a lot of consistency in this government structure. Once you get outside of those 16 nations, the structures have a lot of variabilities. Japan has an emperor who has zero political authority, serving as a figurehead and nothing more. There are African nations that have a sovereign serving as a leader, but the role of that person is closer to an authoritarian dictator than a benefactor.

Report this ad



This flexibility can offer a lot of advantages when the monarchy serves the people first. It can also be inherently dangerous because one person or family can make drastic changes to the government without many ways to stop them.

7. The head of state is usually the final say on all governing matters.

When a monarchy is in place, including constitutional ones, then those who are in leadership roles (such as a prime minister) can wield considerable power. Their decisions are held in check by the sovereign who serves as the head of state. The ability to override is often an unaccountable power given to this one person. Even if Queen Elizabeth II says that something needs to change in presented legislation, then everyone must go back to the drawing board to create something new.

8. Even a figurehead sovereign can replace elected officials who are in

Answer 2

Hereditary kingship is an inheritance of power and a form of govt wherein the throne passes from a ruling family member into another family member of the ruling family.

Explanation:

Advantages

• The unique influence of Monarchy gives people a symbolic and focused field of allegiance and belonging to groups
• Unlike other heads of state within many political structures, a monarch has a life tenure and is not subject to national elections. This form of government reduces the country's enormous costs following elections, as the next leader needs to be elect
• A heir to the throne will be taught the correct manner to govern at an early age.  There are fewer power transfers which happen in hereditary monarchy governments.

Disadvantages

• Since monarchy also uses family lineage as a name to decide who will take over the throne, children have taken this position in various historical instances. Even in the modern era this disadvantage happened.
• Through the succession line come new rulers in the monarchy. Usually this is family-based, however some leaders will appoint a certain individual if they do not leave any heirs. Some people are thus able to receive leadership training at an early age to be ready to go to the throne, but this is not always an advantage.
• When diverse ideas, viewpoints and backgrounds start coming together, nations become more powerful to create a path which promotes progress. When a nation decides to use the monarchy as its form of government, they exist in one individual or his family. This viewpoint is what drives national dynamism.