what is nehruvian legacy
Answers
His vision to stabilise a disintegrated country hit various roadblocks. Faced with daunting challenges, not all that he conceived and preached worked well.
He inherited India in its most difficult period, a time that saw the country struggle to make its historical past meet a new modern reality of independence, democracy and development.
With his unquestioned leadership ability, Nehru chose the path of a centralised economy to develop India.
In his vision, it was the Soviet model that worked the best under the circumstances, even though he was hardly the greatest admirer of the Soviet Union.
He gave India, despite it being a new nation, an international standing. He was also a great believer in democracy and social reform.
He also carried with him a lot of idealism, that in hindsight can be said to have hurt the nation.
His ability to maintain a scrupulous personal honesty did not prevent him from overlooking the corruption around him. He is also now seen as sometimes naiive: he refused, for example, to believe that China would ever attack India.
The 1962 War was a humiliation that the country had to bear. Many also blame the Kashmir imbroglio on his decision not to use adequate military force to suppress Pakistan.
'Nehruvian socialism' has now entered the lexicon as a term that is used to define India's inability to have grown at a pace that could have been much faster.
One way or another, Nehru has become a target of hindsight: he is either adored or reviled for India's progress or lack of it.
A consensus of opinion among scholars is that it is Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India who shaped and laid the foundation pillars of India's foreign policy. These in turn helped shape India as a significant new nation for many decades immediately thereafter. Though India has evolved tremendously over the years, some of the key foreign policy directions laid by Prime Minister Nehru are still intact. Hence it is appropriate to glance back at the Nehruvian legacy in Indian foreign policy after six or seven decades to assess how India has followed Nehru directions in regional, Asian and world relations. This paper is aimed at discussing the foreign policy in Jawaharlal Nehru's India. Nehru was initially influenced by Mahatma Gandhi and as such a follower of Gandhi. According to Frank Moraes (2008) Nehru started his political career as an ardent disciple of Gandhi. Without abandoning his own beliefs and principles Nehru seems to have thrived on subordinating his own ideas to those of Gandhi. This trait and his lyrical style of writing and evocative style of speaking may have contributed for some western world leaders to misconstrue and misjudge Nehru at the beginning. As time passed by, the same leaders were able to see and accept how Nehru steadfastly held on to the values that resulted in betterment of his country. In the aftermath of World War II when the world split between eastern and western blocs, Nehru had emphasized in his speeches the need for peaceful coexistence between countries with different political systems. Nehru influenced other leaders in South East Asia of the way forward in world relations. India was the first in the decolonized process. As its First Prime Minister he had no other country in South Asia/Asia or Africa to learn from on how to self-rule, how to legislate, and how to form foreign policy. Most praiseworthy is the way how he engaged with his own people who comprised of such a diverse ethnic and religious state and in a post-colonial-era (Brown 2010).
HOPE IT HELPS
PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST ☺️