what is political resources can you have explained dipley
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The definition and measurement of political inequality, in some formulations of the concept, requires a definition of political resources. Let’s start with a definition of political inequality.
— In the study of political inequality, political resources are viewed as a dimension of social stratification, including the ability to influence both governance processes and public policy.
— Like economic goods and services, political resources are scarce, valued, and fought for.
What are political resources? Are they different from power resources? Let’s be a bit simple at first and say there are two perspectives (borowed from Piven and Cloward 2005):
(a) Distributional: Resources are anything that can be used to influence an outcome. Resources are used, but it is not power itself. Resources are distributed unequally. “Power resources” is used to describe any resources used in the exercise of power. Political resources are resources used in political decision-making, or for all areas of social-life that are make claims toward a legislative/decision-making body (from school-boards to national government). Political inequality refers to structured differences in the distribution and acquisition of political resources. Power is an attribute of people.
The term “power resources” is misleading, as it suggests that power itself can be distributed. Most distributional theorists argue that power is relational. For example, one actor’s political resource is only a resource if it is perceived as a resource by the other actor.
(b) Interdependency: Resources are never strictly defined and can take the form of anything actors can do within an interaction. Resources are actions available to the participants in the interaction. These resources are valid because they are an integral part of the interdependent relationship. The nature of the interdependent relationship reveals the types of actions (resources) available to each participant. For example, in capitalist economies, ownership of land and wealth is a valid resource. Employers have power over their employees because the employees are dependent on the employer for their economic livelihood. Power is an attribute only of relationships, not people themselves.
The interdependency approach is different from the distributional approach because it assumes that each actor in the interaction has equal power resources. Employers can only make employees work because employees agree to work. If employees decided not to work, such as a work-strike, then the employees could be said “to have power over” the employers. This approach does not adequately account for “force,” or physical coercion.
Resources are political when they enable claims-making toward a legislative/decision-making body. For example, romantic relationships have elements of power, where each participant has a range of actions or range of resources at their disposal to get what they want despite the resistance of the other. But this behavior is not political
Answer:
The definition and measurement of political inequality, in some formulations of the concept, requires a definition of political resources. Let’s start with a definition of political inequality.
— In the study of political inequality, political resources are viewed as a dimension of social stratification, including the ability to influence both governance processes and public policy.
— Like economic goods and services, political resources are scarce, valued, and fought for.
What are political resources? Are they different from power resources? Let’s be a bit simple at first and say there are two perspectives (borowed from Piven and Cloward 2005):