Social Sciences, asked by 55xx10, 10 months ago

what is sustainable development write the step taken to encourage it??
Give all the steps taken to it in discription
It's 100 points

Answers

Answered by dgsboro
1

Explanation:

The measures taken by India for sustainable development include: Using the 3-R approach of reduce, recycle and reuse. The Indian government has urged people to use resources again and again instead of wasting them to prevent their misuse.

Answered by kodavativarshitha11
2

The sustainable development is defined as the development in which we use the existing resources to fulfill our needs while focusing on the needs and requirements of the future generations.

1. Take it step by step

Rather than focusing on long-term objectives and waiting for a turning point that might never come, we need to set our sights on feasible near-future goals and take small steps to achieve them.

There is a tendency in policymaking to postulate very ambitious goals for the far future to compensate for lack of action in the present. This allows us to avoid unpopular decisions but still give the impatient audience the assurance that something drastic will be done in the future.

To actually achieve the SDGs, we should be making plans to run short sprints in the coming years rather than constantly revising our training schedule for an ultramarathon that will last well into the middle of this century.

Step-by-step progress unfolds as a process of continuous and dynamic learning. What has been achieved? Where are new conflicts arising? How can unintended side effects be cushioned? By taking small steps continuously and persistently, we will get closer and closer to reaching our ultimate destination.

2. Think regional, not global

Similarly, we must begin to think in terms of regional rather than global contexts. A global scope is too abstract. It slows processes and saps momentum. Global actions take time in a weak global governance system and, even more important, do not take into account the special regional conditions and contexts that need to be considered when actions need to be effective.

3. Strategically balance conflicting objectives

Measures that benefit the environment do not necessarily offer economic, social or cultural benefits. Nevertheless, the preservation of the ecological foundations of life is a prerequisite for the implementation of economic and social goals and must be prioritised. We need to keep conflicting policy objectives in our sights and make sure we strive for the most critical first, but at the least expense to others.

Of course, every policy in a situation of conflicting values and objectives faces painful trade-offs. There will be winners and losers. But the benefits of transformation must extend to those affected by loss. A society built on the principle of solidarity does not abandon its citizens.

4. Work from the bottom up

Transformations toward sustainability cannot be imposed from above, prescribed by scientists, or squeezed out of society by nongovernmental organisations. They must be initiated and implemented by the very people who will experience their effects—individually and collectively—in the social and cultural contexts in which they live and work.

Throughout an iterative process of learning and change, science can offer valuable guidance and assess the possible effects and side-effects of measures in advance. But it cannot simply prescribe solutions. Those affected are best placed to do so.

They need help, of course—the challenges we face are complex and difficult to understand. But they also need to be in the drivers’ seat, not participating as passive passengers.

5. Use stories to drive change

Science matters, but stories matter as much because they carry the science to the people who can use it. Scientific findings and models play an important role in telling us what we need to do, but that will be the end of the story unless we develop narratives together with those affected and then integrate these narratives within the policymaking process.

People ask themselves why they should change their lives and why they should go through the pain of continuous learning and adapting their lifestyles. Abstract models, whatever their scientific value, cannot provide satisfactory answers. The answers that people need to hear are woven—implicitly and often explicitly—within narratives.

Such narratives are particularly effective when they are told not as tales of cataclysmic horror but as stories of opportunity that portray a better and fulfilling future for all, in which ecological, economic and social concerns can indeed be reconciled.

mark my answer as brainliest

Similar questions