what is the difference between the management and the local people
Answers
Answer:
It’s become a cliché that government would be better if it were run by private-sector managers using standard business practices.
But could the values and objectives of private managers ever be enough to preserve a nation?
Take the definition of the word public – ‘of or concerning the people as a whole’ – and the word private – ‘belonging to or for the use of one particular person or group of people only’.
Public management entails dealing with and/ or controlling the needs and interests of ‘the whole’, which is in many cases the nation.
Private management involves managing the narrower needs of an individual or group.
New-Public-Management-Governance-Table-GetSmarter
This difference in scope constitutes the first and fundamental distinction between public and private management, from which a number of differences arise.
1. The difference between private and public sector values
As they apply to such different groups of people – the whole of society vs. small, competitive subgroups – public and private management keep a vastly different defining value.
Public management values public interest, public needs and political compromise. As a public manager, your primary concern is the overall wellbeing of your society. You endeavour to balance the needs of businesses, interest groups and individuals.
Every man, every woman who has to take up the service of government, must ask themselves two questions:’ Do I love my people in order to serve them better? Am I humble and do I listen to everybody, to diverse opinions in order to choose the best path?
Pope francis
Private management, on the other hand, values business profit.
As a private or business manager, your first concern is the survival and economic success of your business.
2. Public and voluntary sector objectives
Naturally, the different values of public and private management dictate different objectives and definitions of success. Consider these examples:
New-Public-Management-Governance-GetSmarter
The managing director of a pen factory sets a quarterly goal of cutting costs to maximise profits, by using a cheaper ink supplier and switching over to a state-of-the-art conveyor belt.
A presidential directive sets an annual goal to reduce poverty, with mission objectives to reduce “powerlessness” and “apathy”. A multitude of programs are prepared, with their own objectives, agendas and facilitators, to this end.
How do these situations compare?
For the private manager, setting goals and measuring success is straightforward, because objectives can be clearly defined and measured according to profit and loss. The broader implications for competitors, customers and suppliers are not considered in the narrow equation for business efficiency.
For the public manager, objectives are abstract, overarching, somewhat undefined and exceptionally difficult to measure. That is because in the public sector, goals apply to a much broader jurisdiction than a single business. They encompass multiple programs and their success is measured by the overall betterment of society.
3. The importance of public accountability
Accountability differs largely between public and private organisations. Managers in public organisations are accountable to a much larger group of people – everyone in the governed area – and are always under public scrutiny. Such a strong and palpable public influence plays a significant role in their decisions.
Answer:
Managerial employees are responsible for overseeing a group of employees to ensure their efficient functioning. They are thus responsible for not only their work but also for how their reporting team performs. Non-managerial employees are only responsible for their own work and have no overseeing function.
mark me Brainliest!!
: )