Question

what is the difference between the two maps of India in 1154 and 1720?

Answer 1

Over a period of time, the map of an area made by a person differs significantly from that made by another person. This is because of the changes in the information about that region. For exaThis was by the Arab geographer Al-Idrisi.It was made in 1154 CE (Christian era).In this map south India is where we would expect to find north India.Sri Lanka is an island at the top of India.The names of places are marked in Arabic and there are some popular places of Uttar Pradesh like Kanauj (spelt as Qanauj).It was made by a French cartographer (a person who makes maps).It was drawn in the 1720s, i.e. 600 years after Map 1.This map is more familiar to us, i.e. it is more similar to the map we know of than the map drawn by Al-Idrisi.The coastal areas, in particular are detailed.It was used by the European sailors and merchants on their voyages.

Another reason for difference in the maps of two distinct periods is the difference in the science of cartography. When documents, maps and texts from the past are read by historians, they have to keep in mind the differences in the historical backgrounds and the contexts in which the information about the past was produced. Hence maps and documents cannot be interpreted in absolute and independent terms.

Answer 2

Al-Idrisi was an Arab cartographer. Cartographer is the person who draws a map. In the map illustrated by al-Idrisi, we observe a totally contrary opinion. In the map represented by him south, India and Sri Lanka are shown at the top in the map where in modern times North India is located. The titles of places are labeled in Arabic and there are some famous areas of Uttar Pradesh like Kanauj is spelled as Qanauj.

French cartographer has given the map of 1720 with the higher level of familiarity moreover he had given the detailed explanation of all the coastal areas and located places based on accuracy according to their geographical locations.