Question

What is the difference in who exercises ‘Executive Power’ in the above two Constitutions of Nepal? Keeping this in mind, why do you think Nepal needs a new Constitution today?

Answer 1

Yes it needs a new constitution so that in coming future it needs no difficulty to face any outcomes

Answer 2

Answer:

The difference between the two constitutions is that while the 1990 Constitution gives ultimate authority to the king in all matters, the Interim constitution of 2007 states that a Council of Ministers will perform the executive function and decisions will be taken in the name of Prime Minister.

Nepal needs a new constitution because the previous constitution doesn't reflect the ideals of the country. It goes against all interests of the citizens of Nepal.