What is the importance of studying malnutrition?
Answers
Answered by
5
by studying malnutrition, we can understand the cause of malnutrition and can restrict the balanced diet for everyone to avoid malnutrition. In this way we can reduce the number of malnutited children or others who are suffering from malnutrition
Shreya1001:
usko chot nat pohochao
gently baat kro
ho skta hain ki usne tumhari harsh behavior ki wajah se tumko apna dost nhi maana
don't be harsh with her or anyone else in ur life.....
hmm
byyy
Answered by
1
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Data about the prevalence of malnutrition on hospital admission vary and follow-up data are scarce. We assessed the nutritional status of unselected patients on admission and discharge.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A total of 430 consecutively admitted patients were assessed and 168 patients hospitalized > or =6 days were reassessed on discharge. Assessment was carried out by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), weight and anthropometric measurements, bioelectrical impedance analysis, biochemical markers and a subjective clinical assessment by the physicians in charge.
RESULTS: On admission, 47% of all patients were overweight (body mass index, BMI >25 kg m(-2)) and 8% underweight (BMI<18.5 kg m(-2)). In terms of the MNA 70% were adequately nourished, 20% were at risk for malnutrition and 10% were malnourished. By clinical judgment alone 18 (4.3%) malnourished patients according to MNA were missed. The 44 malnourished patients according to the MNA had significantly lower values for BMI, fat-free mass, fat mass, waist circumference, triceps skinfold thickness, hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, total cholesterol but higher values for C-reactive protein. Of the 168 patients staying > or =6 days in hospital, 57% lost and 39% gained weight. Only 1.9% of all patients (8 of 430) were malnourished and lost further weight during hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a low prevalence (10%) of malnourished patients on admission. Clinical judgment and to some extent anthropometrical measurement were helpful for assessing the nutritional status, laboratory values were not.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A total of 430 consecutively admitted patients were assessed and 168 patients hospitalized > or =6 days were reassessed on discharge. Assessment was carried out by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), weight and anthropometric measurements, bioelectrical impedance analysis, biochemical markers and a subjective clinical assessment by the physicians in charge.
RESULTS: On admission, 47% of all patients were overweight (body mass index, BMI >25 kg m(-2)) and 8% underweight (BMI<18.5 kg m(-2)). In terms of the MNA 70% were adequately nourished, 20% were at risk for malnutrition and 10% were malnourished. By clinical judgment alone 18 (4.3%) malnourished patients according to MNA were missed. The 44 malnourished patients according to the MNA had significantly lower values for BMI, fat-free mass, fat mass, waist circumference, triceps skinfold thickness, hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, total cholesterol but higher values for C-reactive protein. Of the 168 patients staying > or =6 days in hospital, 57% lost and 39% gained weight. Only 1.9% of all patients (8 of 430) were malnourished and lost further weight during hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a low prevalence (10%) of malnourished patients on admission. Clinical judgment and to some extent anthropometrical measurement were helpful for assessing the nutritional status, laboratory values were not.
Similar questions