History, asked by riya2093, 6 months ago

what is the meaning of periodisation of history? Who propounded the theory and why was it criticized by Indian historians?​

Answers

Answered by avinash9631
22

Answer:

James Mill claims that all Asian cultures are less humane than Europe. In its prejudicial view of history, James Mill stated that British rule reflected the elements of development and culture, whereas the pre-British rule portrayed misery and bigotry

Answered by prshu
12

Answer:

Periodization is the process or study of categorizing the past into discrete, quantified named blocks of time. This is usually done in order to facilitate the study and analysis of history, understanding current and historical processes, and causality that might have linked those events.

Explanation:

James Mill thought that all Asian societies were at a lower level of civilisation than Europe. In his prejudiced version of history, British rule represented all the forces of progress and civilisation while the period before British rule represents darkness, ignorance, despotism, religious intolerance, caste taboos, superstitious practices, etc. However, the periodisation of Indian history based only on religion is problematic for several reasons. A variety of faiths, apart from Hinduism and Islam, existed in the periods categorised as Hindu and Muslim by Mill. Also, it is not right to classify an age according to the religion of the rulers of that time. By doing so it suggests that the lives and practices of others did not matter. Another point to keep in mind is that all rulers in ancient India did not share the same faith.

tell your free fire id

Similar questions