Question

What is the most plausible theory for you? Explain your thoughts​

Answer 1

Answer:

heeeeeeeeeelo blink

follow me I will follow u back

Answer 2

Answer:

“However, I am looking for what the most scientifically plausible explanation is. The famous examples of course are the Big Bang, and Creationism. With that being said, which theory is the most plausible explanation?”

Creationism states that the universe (and earth) appeared instantaneously in their present form. That is falsified; it is wrong. Since it has been proven wrong, it is not plausible.

Now, “creationism” is often wrongly interpreted to mean “created by deity”. This would mean that the questioner means “was the universe (existence) created by deity or did it happen without deity (Big Bang)”?

Big Bang happened. The evidence supporting it is overwhelming. However, that leads to another question: what caused the Big Bang? After all, Big Bang describes what happened, not why it happened.

This cause is often called “First Cause”. The uncaused cause that started the whole cause and effect chain that is the universe.

Right now there are at least 5 possible candidates for First Cause to get the universe. They are, in no particular order:

1. Logical and mathematical necessity. The equations and laws of the universe are so compelling that they forced the formation of a universe for them to describe.

2. Deity. A God or Gods created the universe.

3. Quantum fluctuation. Events at the quantum level are uncaused. The universe is a huge quantum event.

4. No Boundary. This is a proposal by Stephen Hawking and updated with Turok. If all the dimensions of the universe were the same shortly after the Big Bang, you get a universe that doesn't have a beginning and therefore was never "created". It just IS.

5. Ekpyrotic. The universe is the result of a random collision between two quantum membranes in 11 dimensions. The 11 dimension 'brane is equivalent to deity in that it has always existed.

It is a classic case of multiple competing hypotheses with insufficient data to choose between them. None have been falsified, so all are still on the table as far as science is concerned.

All of them are “plausible”, but it is impossible to rank them as “more plausible” to “less plausible”. Any ranking is based on personal preference, not science.

This situation is one of 2 areas in science where it is possible to hypothesize direct action by deity.

Explanation: