Question

what is the problem with the periodisation of Indian history that James mill offers​

Answer 1

$\huge{\bold{\red{\underline{\underline{Question}}}}}$

$<font colour="black"><b>$What is the problem with the periodisation of Indian history that James mill offers​?

$\huge{\bold{\green{\underline{\underline{Answer}}}}}$

$<font colour="black"><b>$James Mill divided Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation has its own problem. It is difficult to refer to any period of history as ‘Hindu’ or ‘Muslim’ because a variety of faiths existed simultaneously in these periods. It is also not justified to characterise an age through the religion of the rulers of the time. What it suggests is that the lives and practices of others do not really matter. It is worth-mentioning that even rulers in ancient India did not all share the same faith.
__________
$<marquee>$Thanks✊..

Answer 2

James mill divided Indian history into 3 periods Hindu , Muslim and British . This periodization has its own problem. It's very difficult to refer to any period of history as Hindu , Muslim and British because a variety of faiths existed simultaneously in these periods. It's also not justified to characteristics an age through the religion of the rulars of the time. What is suggested that the lives and practices of other don't really matter, it's worth mentioning that even rulars in ancient India didn't all share the same faith.

hope it helps