What is the resolution of this Lewis-Tolman-like paradox?
Answers
Answered by
0
Hey mate ^_^
When a rigid right-angled lever experiences equal and opposite torques as measured by an observer O′ at rest with respect to the lever in frame S′, the usual transformation of these torques to another Lorentz frame S makes it appear that the torques are not balanced for an observer O at rest in S....
The consensus among textbook authors is that a net torque does exist on the lever according to the general Lorentz observer.....
#Be Brainly❤️
When a rigid right-angled lever experiences equal and opposite torques as measured by an observer O′ at rest with respect to the lever in frame S′, the usual transformation of these torques to another Lorentz frame S makes it appear that the torques are not balanced for an observer O at rest in S....
The consensus among textbook authors is that a net torque does exist on the lever according to the general Lorentz observer.....
#Be Brainly❤️
Answered by
0
Hello mate here is your answer.
When a rigid right-angled lever experiences equal and opposite torques as measured by an observer O′ at rest with respect to the lever in frame S′, the usual transformation of these torques to another Lorentz frame S makes it appear that the torques are not balanced for an observer O at rest in S.The consensus among textbook authors is that a net torque does exist on the lever according to the general Lorentz observer.
Hope it helps you.
When a rigid right-angled lever experiences equal and opposite torques as measured by an observer O′ at rest with respect to the lever in frame S′, the usual transformation of these torques to another Lorentz frame S makes it appear that the torques are not balanced for an observer O at rest in S.The consensus among textbook authors is that a net torque does exist on the lever according to the general Lorentz observer.
Hope it helps you.
Similar questions