What is the theoretical efficiency of fusion?
Answers
Answered by
0
What is the theoretical limit of the amount of energy that can be extracted from a fusion reaction? I am not talking about the practical efficiency of a reactor, but rather what fraction of the mass-energy can be released.
Of the theoretically possible fusion reactions, combining 56 free nucleons into 5656Fe would release 9.1538 MeV per nucleon. Combining 28 free protons and 34 neutrons into 6262Ni would give a slightly tighter binding per nucleon. This seems to represent an empirical limit to fusion, converting 0.00935605478 (iron) and 0.0096783439 (nickel) of the nuclear mass into energy. So this limit seems to be ≈≈0.97%. By comparison, the proton-proton chain leading to 44He is 0.7% efficient.
But there could in principle exist other, unknown forms of fusion. The recent quark fusion discoveryis about eight times more energetic than normal fusion, although it is a rather nonstandard form of fusion since it involves heavy quarks. We can generalise fusion as the process of reorganising existing matter to release energy by increasing the binding energy due to the strong force (this will leave out gravitational accretion). Were zero-pressure stable strange matter to exist it would presumably represent an even more efficient fusion target. It seems likely that fusion involving the full strong force rather than the residual strong force will be more efficient.
I hope you like it if yes then make me as brainlist plz plz plz
It'z Rohit : Follow Me
Of the theoretically possible fusion reactions, combining 56 free nucleons into 5656Fe would release 9.1538 MeV per nucleon. Combining 28 free protons and 34 neutrons into 6262Ni would give a slightly tighter binding per nucleon. This seems to represent an empirical limit to fusion, converting 0.00935605478 (iron) and 0.0096783439 (nickel) of the nuclear mass into energy. So this limit seems to be ≈≈0.97%. By comparison, the proton-proton chain leading to 44He is 0.7% efficient.
But there could in principle exist other, unknown forms of fusion. The recent quark fusion discoveryis about eight times more energetic than normal fusion, although it is a rather nonstandard form of fusion since it involves heavy quarks. We can generalise fusion as the process of reorganising existing matter to release energy by increasing the binding energy due to the strong force (this will leave out gravitational accretion). Were zero-pressure stable strange matter to exist it would presumably represent an even more efficient fusion target. It seems likely that fusion involving the full strong force rather than the residual strong force will be more efficient.
I hope you like it if yes then make me as brainlist plz plz plz
It'z Rohit : Follow Me
Answered by
0
I hope it will help you
Attachments:
Similar questions